Weekend Reading: Pilates Style


Written on January 16, 2010 – 2:17 pm | by admin

My January issue of Pilates Style magazine arrived a few days ago. This is the big issue I look forward to every year because it has a huge section on Pilates resources – training programs, equipment, media, etc. But they went beyond the ordinary this year and included articles to meet just about anyone’s interest. Sure there is the requisite flat abs workout, but along with that there are human interest stories, health tips, an article on Breema body work, and an article on the Franklin Method among others. They really went for it — big and glossy.

Of course the thing is also jam packed with ads, but you have to make money somehow. My only complaint is that it is so obvious that Pilates Style mostly only promotes companies that advertise with them, and I find that too insular. For example, they failed to mention one of the largest free resources for Pilates information and exercise instructions online (well, really!). hmpff.

Nevertheless, January Pilates Style is a good issue, and I’ll suggest that you might enjoy crashing out on the with it couch for a while. Then, when you feel rejuvenated and inspired you can get up and actually do some Pilates! In fact, you could choose exercises and routines from the big selection of exercise instructions I have here.

By the way, I don’t get anything for plugging Pilates Style. I’ve just been finding that the magazine has been improving over the years.

Compare Prices on Subscriptions (yes, I get like a penny or so if you use my pricegrabber link, but it’s on the newsstand too)

Exercise of the Week: Bridge on the Ball


Written on January 14, 2010 – 8:05 am | by admin

Bridge on the ball focuses on the hamstrings and glutes, but requires a lot of core stability to pull off. I am happy to have a fine new video to show you bridge on the ball.

The new video was made for us by Movements Afoot in NYC. In it, they demonstrate the exercise, and break it down so you can see how to get the alignment right, and engage your hamstrings during the whole exercise.
See: Bridge on the Ball

No Ball? See: Shoulder Bridge Prep

More Pilates Videos Online

Have the Exercise of the Week, along with other great Pilates info, sent directly to you each week in the Free Pilates Newsletter.

Lawmakers, Public Grapple With Health Care Endgame


Written on January 13, 2010 – 7:02 pm | by admin

Many Democrats consider their health overhaul increasingly politically dicey now, but “are betting that the only thing worse than passing a bill many of them don’t like is not passing one at all,” the San Francisco Chronicle reports. Failure to pass legislation, according to House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, “would be very bad for the American people and very, very bad for us.” According to the article, “[a] year of Democratic in-fighting, compromises and relentless GOP attacks have deeply tarnished health reform’s luster,” and fostered the assumption that the overhaul would increase premiums and cost more than expected. But Democrats believe they must act soon to pass reforms while they still hold a 60-vote majority in the Senate (Lochhead, 1/11).

Democrats’ narrow filibuster-busting Senate majority will be jeopardized by this autumn’s election, with two senior Democrats last week announcing that they would retire at the end of the current session, McClatchy/The Seattle Times reports. Among the “number of modern, rapidly changing political dynamics” exerting pressure on Congress are “the rise of hyper-partisanship magnified by today’s Internet, talk-radio and cable-TV ideologues; the drawing of legislative district lines to maximize partisan purity and to avoid making lawmakers have to appeal to voters of all stripes; and the passing from the scene of legislative veterans who came of age politically in the pre-technology age and who were schooled in the art of compromise” (Lightman, 1/9).

Meanwhile, the Senate’s liberals have also found themselves “on the defensive,” even though attention has focused on the political troubles of moderates, The Hill reports. “Most of the criticism of liberals has come from left-wing advocacy groups angry at the bill’s lack of a public option. Such a component was dropped from the measure earlier in December” (Rushing, 1/11).

In the House, Republicans are actively seeking to recruit Democrats to the minority party, The Washington Times reports. “Republicans have listed 37 Democrats who they think are vulnerable to political pressure on the issues of Medicare funding, abortion and the federal budget. The list includes several Democrats in moderate districts who could face difficult re-election fights.” Democrats earlier passed their version of the overhaul by a three-vote margin (Haberkorn, 1/11).

And, the White House has struggled this year to sell the health overhaul to the public, sending disparate messages that ranged from arguments that health reform was a moral imperative to those suggesting the measure was really meant to save money, The Washington Post reports. “The president and his aides sent mixed signals on the ‘public option’ as well, voicing support for a government-run plan while signaling their willingness to see it die to get a bill passed” (Balz, 1/10).

The New York Times reports on the gulf between voters expectations for President Barack Obama’s optimistic plans for tackling health care early in his administration and the reality of today’s debate. One Colorado voter, an auto mechanic, “said in an interview at his shop, the Congressional debate deteriorated into a partisan brawl, and Congress has virtually ignored his biggest concern: holding down health costs.” The Times says, “The concern illustrates the challenge Mr. Obama and Democratic lawmakers face in trying to meld House and Senate bills in a way that can be sold to the public. All kinds of issues are still in play, from how to cover abortion to whether to tax high-cost health plans” (Pear, 1/10).

This information was reprinted from kaiserhealthnews.org with kind permission from the Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. You can view the entire Kaiser Daily Health Policy Report, search the archives and sign up for email delivery at kaiserhealthnews.org.

© Henry J. Kaiser Family Foundation. All rights reserved.

Final Health Reform Bill Likely To Cover More Frequent Mammograms Than USPSTF Recommends


Written on January 12, 2010 – 11:07 pm | by admin

Under pressure from doctors, some women’s groups and imaging equipment makers, lawmakers are likely to require coverage for more mammograms in health reform legislation than is currently recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force, the Wall Street Journal reports.

According to the Journal, many doctors’ and patients’ groups in recent years have formed alliances — such as sponsorships, joint events and endorsements — with companies that make mammography equipment. The groups and their corporate partners “swung into action” in November 2009 after USPSTF issued new guidelines suggesting that routine mammograms were not necessary for women in their 40s who have normal cancer risk, the Journal reports. USPSTF said the risks associated with annual mammograms — such as false positives, unnecessary treatment and low-level radiation exposure — could outweigh the benefits for many women in their 40s. The panel recommended that women ages 50 through 74 receive mammograms biennially.

The new recommendations “sowed unease and confusion,” including among major medical societies that disagree with USPSTF, the Journal reports. Advocacy groups stepped up lobbying, and their supporters “swamped lawmakers with angry calls and e-mails” urging them to guarantee access to mammograms under health reform legislation, the Journal reports.

The House in December 2009 voted 426-0 for a nonbinding resolution — named for Rep. Debbie Wasserman Schultz (D-Fla.), a breast cancer survivor — saying that insurers should not use the USPSTF recommendations to deny coverage for routine mammograms. The Senate adopted a similar amendment by Sen. Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) to its health reform bill (HR 3590). Congressional aides say that a version of the amendment is likely to be in the final bill.

Meanwhile, a few women’s health groups that receive little or no corporate financing are standing behind the USPSTF guidelines. Fran Visco, founder of the National Breast Cancer Coalition, said, “The guidelines were always going to create a firestorm because they threaten some groups’ existence.” Adriane Fugh-Berman, a professor at the Georgetown University School of Medicine, said, “You have to ask if there’s a conflict of interest, because breast cancer advocacy has become big business.”

Sen. Chuck Grassley (R-Iowa) last month sent letters to 33 major not-for-profit groups requesting that they disclose their industry funding. The American Cancer Society said that it had received less than $1 million from screening device makers over the past five years, a sum that its spokesperson said is small compared with its more than $1 billion in annual revenue. The money does not influence ACS’ recommendations, the spokesperson added. Nancy Brinker — co-founder of Susan G. Komen for the Cure, which has received money through partnerships with GE — said the organization has always pushed for early detection (Mundy, Wall Street Journal, 1/12).

Reprinted with kind permission from http://www.nationalpartnership.org. You can view the entire Daily Women’s Health Policy Report, search the archives, or sign up for email delivery here. The Daily Women’s Health Policy Report is a free service of the National Partnership for Women & Families, published by The Advisory Board Company.